G-1-95 SIXTH FLOOR, 900 HOWE STREET, BOX 250 TELEPHONE: (604) 660-4700 VANCOUVER, B.C. V6Z 2N3 BC TOLL FREE: 1-800-663-1385 CANADA FACSIMILE: (604) 660-1102 AN ORDER IN THE MATIER OF the Utilities Commission Act, S.B.C. 1980, c. 60, as amended An Application by West Kootenay Power Ltd. for Approval to Participate in the BC 21 Power Smart Program BEFORE: M.K. Jaccard, Chairperson; and ) K.L. Hall, Commissioner ) January 5, 1995 ORDER WHEREAS: A. On December 16, 1994 West Kootenay Power Ltd. ("WKP") applied to the Commission for approval of amendments to Rate Schedule 90 - Energy Management Service in order to participate in the joint provincial government/utility residential energy conservation program referred to as the BC 21 Power Smart Program ("the Program"); and B. WKP estimates that its cost of participation in the Program will be approximately $200,000 and will be set up in rate base, amortized and recovered in customer rates commencing January 1, 1996; and C. The Program will reach additional WKP residential customers with energy saving initiatives such as walk-through energy audits, low-flow showerheads and faucet aerators, flow-reduction devices for toilets, hot water tank insulation wraps, draft-proofing and weather-stripping, and will be in place commencing January 1, 1995 and will end June 30, 1996; and D. The Commission has considered the Application and is satisfied that approval is necessary and in the public interest. NOW THEREFORE the Commission orders as follows: The Commission approves for WKP, First Revision of Sheet No. 56 covering amendments to Electric Tariff Rate Schedule 90 - Energy Management Service and WKP's participation in the BC 21 Power Smart Program, commencing January 1, 1995. The Commission's Reasons for Decision are attached as Appendix A. DATED at the City of Vancouver, in the Province of British Columbia, this day of January, 1995 BY ORDER H Dr. Mark K. Jaccard . Chairperson Attachment
Appendix A to Order No. G-1-95 BRITISH COLUMBIA UTILITIES COMMISSION Reasons for Decision The Commission has reviewed and, in the Order accompanying these Reasons, approves the West Kootenay Power Ltd. ("WKp l ) expenditure of $200,000 for its participation in the BC 21 Power Smart Program in conjunction with the provincial government and other utilities. The Commission's reasons for approval of the Application are twofold: Firsf,···WKPliasaiialyzedlhe··impact···OfitsparticipatiOiiiiilheBC··2·1···POwerSrnart···Program 011 the tOtal costs of the utility and on the impact on rates. The analysis indicates that the benefits of the program will exceed the utility's costs by a significant margin although, because of the impact of lost revenues resulting from the energy conservation component of the program, the per unit rates of the utility would rise marginally. However, because of the anticipated reduction in energy use, the average bills paid by participating ratepayers would be expected to decrease. WKP has indicated the impacts of the BC 21 Power Smart Program will be similar to those of the existing Homeguard program. Second, these rate and bill impacts exclude any environmental benefits that will be achieved due to the reductions in energy and water use. As utilities have more aggressively begun to promote Demand-Side Management programs that may include both energy efficiency and fuel-switching programs, a key issue for the Commission has been how to incorporate the environmental and other social costs into the resource evaluation and selection procedure of utilities so that the socially optimal mix of energy resources and energy services is selected and delivered to ratepayers. In other words, if utilities are going to provide least-cost energy services to consumers, how are the utilities and the Commission going to assess the social and environmental costs to ensure that all costs - financial and otherwise - are incorporated into the decision-making processes? While attempting to ensure that social costs are included, the Commission has been aware that the utilities it regulates provide only a portion of the energy services delivered in British Columbia, and that moving too aggressively to include such costs could also serve to distort energy markets. Moreover, estimates of environmental and social costs and benefits are based on societal values which the Commission cannot unreasonably impose on society, although it may attempt to incorporate into decision-making such values or estimates as it comfortably feels are reasonable. Therefore, the Commission looks, where possible, to policy statements or other signals from government to reassure itself that the degree of importance it puts on social and environmental values for resource allocation and energy service delivery is reasonable. In this instance, the Commission interprets the government contribution to the BC 21 Power Smart Program to reflect the level of the provincial government's support for the environmental and other social benefits of this program, and it is in this context that the Commission approves the WKP Application as in the public interest. OrderslWKP-Be2l Prgnn DfrlAcct
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.