sr\ COL.u ~\ ~ If?~ ~ x...t 10. QJ ~':~:' II'/, Ji' c , r " ; ,~ ~ , SIXTH FLOOR, 900 HOWE STREET, BOX 250 ? ;.; ~ ~ .. : 'G VANCOUVER, B.C. V6Z 2N3 '\/r, ,,' ". ,'. ," '., CANADA /~S·~~~~\ IN THE MATTER OF the Utilities Commission Act, S.B.C. 1980, c. 60, as amended and an Application by BC Gas Utility Ltd. for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Various Land and Building Improvement Projects BEFORE: M.K. Jaccard, Chairperson; and K.L. Hall, Commissioner CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY WHEREAS: A. Commission Order No. G-99-95, dated November 28, 1995, approved the terms of a negotiated settlement for the BC Gas Utility Ltd. ("BC Gas") 1996-98 Revenue Requirements application. The settlement terms provided that certain capital projects would require Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity ("CPCN") applications; and B. On June 5, 1996, pursuant to Order No. G-99-95, BC Gas applied to the Commission for a CPCN for approval of various land and building improvement projects and a design and construction procedures development program ("the Application"); and C. The Commission has reviewed the cost, timing and justification contained in the Application and has determined that approval of the Application is necessary and in the public interest. NOW THEREFORE the Commission orders as follows: 1. Pursuant to Section 51 of the Utilities Commission Act, a CPCN is granted to BC Gas for various projects in accordance with the Application 2. BC Gas is expected to complete the projects within the costs detailed in the Application and is to file a variance review of final costs with the Commission before applying for inclusion of costs of the projects in rates. DATED at the City of Vancouver, in the Province of British Columbia, this Orders/BCG- CPCN Appl-Various Proj. ••• ,... . .. . ;.; ~ ru ~ .. ~ . 0 : z -III . '.. .; r_ cf)J TELEPHONE: (604) 660-4700 BC TOLL FREE: 1-800-663-1385 FACSIMILE: (604) 660-1102 ) ) June 20, 1996 day of June, 1996. BY ORDER Dr. Mark K. Chairperson
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.