Orders

Decision Information

Decision Content

<0\'\ COL.& ~\ " ~ ... ~..... QJ ~ .".':~:,,- If/, )iI' S ~ '. ~ !-, SIXTH FLOOR, 900 HOWE STREET, BOX 250 (' ., VANCOUVER, B,C. V6Z 2N3 /..,>-; ••' ~" CANADA /12'8 .~~~~\ IN THE MATTER OF the Utilities Commission Act, S.B.C. 1980, c. 60, as amended and An Application for a Participant Funding Cost Award by the Kootenay-Okanagan Electric Consumers Association for the West Kootenay Power Ltd. Brilliant Energy Supply Contracts Application BEFORE: M. K. Jaccard, Chairperson; and K.L. Hall, Commissioner ORDER WHEREAS: A. On April 18, 1996 the Commission issued Order No. G-36-96 and its Reasons for Decision into West Kootenay Power Ltd.'s ("WKP") application for approval of Energy Supply Contracts, Energy Transmission Contracts and Energy Related Agreements concerning the output of the Brilliant Plant. Following amendments, the Commission approved the Agreements and issued Order No. E-7-96; and B. On September 8, 1996 the Kootenay-Okanagan Electric Consumers Association ("ECA") filed an application for a participant funding cost award with respect to its participation in the Castlegar public hearing; and C. The Panel determined that the ECA's attendance at the public hearing requires reimbursement In accordance with Commission approved guidelines; and D. The Panel discussed the claim having regard to the criteria and rates set out in Order No. G-117-93. NOW THEREFORE the Commission orders as follows: I. Pursuant to Section 133.1(1) of the Utilities Commission Act, the Commission awards funds to the ECA in the amount of $2,032.79. 2. WKP is directed to reimburse the ECA the total cost award in a timely manner. DA TED at the City of Vancouver, in the Province of British Columbia, this OrdersIWKP-ESC&PF-KOECA ~ If?~ ;..; .~. ~ .-!' 0 2 s 'C .' I I O " ' ' . ., . C r ;J _ TELEPHONE: (604) 660-4700 BC TOLL FREE: 1-800-663-1365 FACSIMILE: (604) 660-1102 ) ) September 12, 1996 day of September, 1996. BY ORDER Dr. Mark K. Chairperson
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.