sr\ COL. ~\ ~ g l':~: ~:p::;. c, .!-.: " \ " \ ?~~:-... "/ . .. , ' ::-'G ROBERT J. PELLATT '/~ COMMISSION SECRETARY /~S CO~~\ VIA FACSIMILE Mr. David A. Harrison Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority 18th Floor, 333 Dunsmuir Street Vancouver, RC. V6B 5R3 Dear Mr. Harrison: Re: British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority Application to Amend the Terms and Conditions of the Electric Tariff Relating to the Schedule of Standard Charges and Definitions On February 17, 1995 B.C. Hydro filed an application to amend its Schedule of Standard Charges and Definitions section contained in its Electric Tariff. On September 11, 1995, in response to Commission Order No. G-50-95 which directed RC. Hydro to participate in the generic hearing on systems extensions, B.C. Hydro re-submitted its application which was further amended on October 19, 1995. The Commission's Decision and Order No. G-19-96 on Utility System Extension Tests was issued on February 16, 1996 and directed B.C. Hydro, along with several other utilities, to file for Commission approval, revised system extension tests on or before May 31, 1996. As RC. Hydro's application to amend the Schedule of Standard Charges and Definitions section of its Electric Tariff relates to issues which are considered in the Commission's Decision on Utility System Extension Tests, the Commission is not prepared to approve the application at this time. B.C. Hydro is directed to submit, or re-submit, its application for changes to the Standard Charges and Definitions of its Electric Tariff in conjunction with its submission of a revised system extension test application. RJP/cms cc: Registered Intervenors (MXR) BCH/Cor/SubmitApploChges&Defnts LETTER NO. L·13·96 u ~ <$> ~ '~~~it ~ "1 1 1 ~ ~. ~ : ..t. ;Z ". 0 SIXTH FLOOR, 900 HOWE STREET, BOX 250 VANCOUVER, B.C. CANADA V6Z 2N3 \ I ': I II . ' ::. ." . C r ;J _ TELEPHONE: (604) 660-4700 BC TOLL FREE: 1-800-663-1385 FACSIMILE: (604) 660-1102 March 20, 1996 Yours truly,
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.