Orders

Decision Information

Decision Content

LETTER NO. L-33-04 SIXTH FLOOR, 900 HOWE STREET, BOX 250 ROBERT J. PELLATT VANCOUVER, B.C. CANADA V6Z 2N3 COMMISSION SECRETARY TELEPHONE: (604) 660-4700 Commission.Secretary@bcuc.com BC TOLL FREE: 1-800-663-1385 web site: http://www.bcuc.com FACSIMILE: (604) 660-1102 Log No. 6639 VIA E-MAIL regulatory.affairs@terasengas.com July 5, 2004 Mr. Scott Thomson Vice President Finance and Regulatory Affairs Terasen Gas Inc. 16705 Fraser Highway Surrey, B.C. V3S 2X7 Dear Mr. Thomson: Re: Terasen Gas Inc. Application to Discontinue External Audit This letter responds to the Terasen Gas Inc. (“Terasen Gas”, TGI”) letter dated June 22, 2004. In that letter TGI applied to discontinue the requirement for a review by its external auditor of TGIs compliance with the Transfer Pricing Policy (“TPP”) and Code of Conduct (“CoC”). The TGI application is based on the section of the Multi-Year Performance Based Rate Settlement Agreement for setting rates for the period 2004 - 2008, approved by Commission Order No. G-51-03, which states that: “... before the first Annual Review, Terasen Gas independent external auditor will review the work performed by Terasen Gas Internal Audit Services and at the first Annual Review, consistent with Section 8600 of the CICA handbook Review of Compliance with Agreements and Regulations”, will provide a report of Terasen Gas compliance with the Code of Conduct and Transfer Pricing Policy. Subsequent to the first Annual Review, Stakeholders and Terasen Gas may make submissions to the Commission regarding whether or not such a review and report by the independent external auditor of Terasen Gas should be continued for other Annual Reviews.” TGI cites three reasons in support of its request to discontinue the need for an external auditors review of TGIs compliance with the CoC and the TPP. (1) Results of reviews by TGI Internal Audit Services (“IAS”) and the external auditor, KPMG, both provided at the first Annual Review, found no evidence of non-compliance; (2) The cost of the external auditors review is $14,980; and (3) The Commission concluded, following its review of the complaint by the Heating Ventilating and Cooling Industry Association of British Columbia (“HVCI”), that with recent steps taken by TGI, the HVCI complaint with respect to non-compliance with the TPP and CoC had been satisfied. . . . /2
LETTER NO. L-33-04 2 TGI has circulated copies of its letter to participants in the 2004-2008 Negotiated Settlement Process. Avista Energy, by letter dated June 24, 2004, has responded to the TGI application and submitted that the services of an independent external auditor as they relate to the CoC and TPP should be continued. By letter dated June 30, 2004, the Lower Mainland Large Gas Users Association also submitted that the services of an independent external auditor were warranted and should be continued. The Commission has reviewed the TGI application and the responses from Avista and the Lower Mainland Large Gas Users Association. The Commission notes that although the IAS review did not find any instances where TGI was not in compliance with the CoC or TPP, it did make some recommendations for business process improvements that would “...increase awareness and compliance with BCUC Policies”. The Commission concludes that the external auditor should carry out another review of TGIs compliance with the CoC and the TPP prior to TGIs next Annual Review. The results of the reviews by both IAS and the external auditor should be provided at the next Annual Review. TGI may canvass parties at the Annual Review about the need for further reviews by the external auditor and, if there is sufficient support for the idea by the participants in the Annual Review, TGI may apply to the Commission to have the requirement removed in subsequent years covered by the Negotiated Settlement. Yours truly, Original signed by: R.J. Pellatt JWF/dlf cc: TGI-PBR-NSP Participants TGI/Cor/Deny Discontinue External Audit
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.