LETTER NO. L-8-08
SIXTH FLOOR, 900 HOWE STREET, BOX 250
ERICA M. HAMILTON
VANCOUVER, B.C. CANADA V6Z 2N3
COMMISSION SECRETARY
TELEPHONE: (604) 660-4700
Commission.Secretary@bcuc.com
BC TOLL FREE: 1-800-663-1385
web site: http://www.bcuc.com
FACSIMILE: (604) 660-1102
Log No. 24600
VIA E-MAIL
regulatory.affairs@terasengas.com
March 18, 2008
Mr. Scott Thomson
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs
and Chief Financial Officer
Terasen Gas Inc.
16705 Fraser Highway
Surrey, B.C. V4N 0E8
Dear Mr. Thomson:
Re: Terasen Gas Inc. (“Terasen Gas”)
CEG Energy’s letter dated March 13, 2008
CEG Energy’s Total Delivery Requirements
for the Period August 1, 2007 through October 31, 2007
The Essential Services model is an integral component of the Customer Choice Program and it is vital that the
calculation of the Daily Commodity Quantity (“DCQ”) be as transparent as possible. In fact, the Report for
British Columbia Utilities Commission April 8 Meeting indicated under Operational Issues, Section 3 that a
validation of the DCQ is necessary so that the Gas Marketers can gain a better understanding of the algorithm and
the input factors such as weather and customer usage patterns. The Commission believes that it is essential for the
success of the Customer Choice Program that Gas Marketers have confidence in the calculation of the DCQ
amounts.
The current dispute with CEG Energy Options (“CEG”) as outlined in CEG’s letter dated March 13, 2008
highlights a specific problem but it is based on a fundamental concern to the majority of Gas Marketers.
Therefore an exchange of information between this Gas Marketer and Terasen Gas that can lead to a better
understanding of the algorithm is the preferred method to resolve this dispute.
As outlined by CEG, there were minimal changes in commercial customer additions or deletions in the period
May to August and minor changes in November. In CEG’s graph on page 2 of its letter dated March 13, 2008
(attached) there is obviously an anomaly that appears for the August–October, 2007 period. CEG proposes that
this is the result of incorrect data input for price group CEG015. Therefore, the Commission requests that Terasen
Gas comply with CEG’s proposal:
“CEG requests that the BCUC direct Terasen to recalculate the CEG delivery requirements for
the August period utilizing the CEG customers under contract for that period and utilizing data
factor adjustments that were utilized to determine CEG’s delivery requirements for November
2007. CEG also requests that all the data used for this revised allocation are provided to CEG
and the Commission for review.”
…/2
LETTER NO. L-8-08
2
Terasen Gas is requested to provide the DCQ calculation for each CEG customer group and the total DCQ for
CEG.
Yours truly,
Original signed by:
Erica Hamilton
RB/rt
Attachment
cc:
Mr. Kirby Morrow, CEG Energy Options (kmorrow@cegenergy.com)
Mr. Kevin Thrasher, Lawson Lundell LLP(kthrasher@lawsonlundell.com)
Gas Marketers Licences/Gen Cor/CEG Energy’s Total Delivery Requirements
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.