Orders

Decision Information

Decision Content

Via Email

                                                                                                                                June 18, 2010

 

 

FortisBC – Rate Design &

Cost of Service Study                          Exhibit A-27

To:          FortisBC Inc.

                Registered Interveners

                (FBC-2009RD-RI)

 

Re:  An Application by FortisBC Inc.

Project No. 3698564/Order G-139-09

2009 Rate Design and Cost of Service Analysis -
Fortis Responses to Information Requests and Timetable for Further Process

 

British Columbia Utilities Commission (Commission) Letter L-44-10 invited FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) and Interveners to comment on a letter from Zellstoff Celgar (Celgar), dated June 7, 2010, concerning some of the information requests (IRs) submitted to FortisBC with respect to hearing Exhibits B-33 and B-35.  Celgar identified specific IRs they object to (the Contentious IRs), and gave reasons for their objections.  Letter L-44-10 specified that the Commission Panel would issue a determination on further process concurrently with its determination on the Contentious IRs.

 

The Commission received comments on Letter L-44-10 from the BC Municipal Electrical Utilities, Big White Ski Resort, and FortisBC.  Considering the comments received, the Commission Panel has determined that FortisBC should respond to all of the Contentious IRs.  The responses should be sent to the Commission by Wednesday, June 23, 2010.

 

Regarding further process, the Commission Panel has determined that the Supplementary Regulatory Timetable, specified in Attachment “A” to Order G-86-10, will be amended as follows:

 

FortisBC Final Argument

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Intervener Final Arguments

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

FortisBC Reply Argument

Friday, July 23, 2010

Interveners' Replies to Other Intervener Arguments

Friday, July 23, 2010

FortisBC Further Replies to Interveners (if applicable)

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Oral Phase of Argument (if necessary) (in Vancouver)

Week of August 30th

 

The Commission requests that parties, in their submissions, address the impact, if any, of the recent amendments to the Utilities Commission Act resulting from the enactment of the Clean Energy Act on the relief sought by FortisBC in the Application.

 

                                                                                                                                  Yours truly,

 

                                                                                                                                  Original signed by:

 

                                                                                                                                  Erica M. Hamilton

cms

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.