Orders

Decision Information

Decision Content

Via Email

reception@woodwardandcompany.com                                                        September 3, 2010

 

 

 

Ms. Leah Mack

Mr. David Robbins

Mr. Drew Mildon

Woodward & Company

Barristers & Solicitors

Second Floor

844 Courtenay Street

Victoria, BC   V8W 1C4

 

Dear Sirs/Madam:

 

Re:  British Columbia Utilities Commission

Project No. 3698545/Order G-30-09

Inquiry into British Columbia’s Long-Term Transmission Infrastructure

Participant Assistance/Cost Award Funding for the

Toquaht First Nation, Cowichan Tribes, Liard First Nation, and Tsawout First Nation

 

This is in response to your recent letters dated August 5, 10, 16, and 23, in which you request participant assistance funding to cover the following periods:

 

                      Toquaht First Nation                      period from July 16, 2009 through June 4, 2010 for $46,767.08

                      Cowichan Tribes                             period from July 16, 2009 through June 4, 2010 for $2,268.62

                      Liard First Nation                            period from October 1, 2009 to June 4, 2010 for $2,804.65

                      Tsawout First Nation                      period from October 15, 2009 through June 4, 2010 for $3,734.50

 

The requests are denied for being out of time and for, in part, covering the period when the Inquiry had been suspended.  The following events should have put you on notice that work done during the suspension period would not be reimbursed and failure to make a submission for a cost award by January 29, 2010 would also mean that a cost award for Interim Period 3 would not be considered:

 

1.       By letter dated December 17, 2009 (Exhibit A-35) the Commission forwarded a copy of the Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources December 15, 2009 letter regarding the suspension of the Inquiry and advised that the Panel would shortly issue an Order suspending the Inquiry until May 31, 2010.

 

2.       By Order G-157-09 dated December 21, 2009 (Exhibit A-37) the Commission suspended the Inquiry until May 31, 2010.  The Order states that “the Commission will not be accepting submissions on Inquiry issues, other than those required for administrative purposes to suspend the Inquiry.”

 

3.       On December 21, 2009, the Commission responded to an inquiry from Chief Lydia Hwitsum of the Cowichan Tribes advising that as the review process was being suspended until May 31, 2010, pursuant to the December 15, 2009 letter from the Minister of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources (Exhibit A-35), the Commission Panel was not in a position to either approve or deny the request for capacity funding.

 

4.       On January 12, 2010, the Commission sent a letter to all Inquiry Participants stating that due to the suspension of the Inquiry, there would not be a subsequent bi-monthly award for Interim Period 3, and consequently parties who had not submitted a cost award for that period by the December 15 deadline would be allowed to do so by January 29, 2010.

 

5.       The time between May 31, 2010 and the Commission’s Order G-98-10 dated June 4, 2010 cancelling the Inquiry pursuant to the Clean Energy Act (CEA)(Exhibit A-38) was a few days.  The CEA received Royal Assent on June 3, 2010, 

 

The Panel is of the view that adequate notice was provided to participants regarding the date by which cost awards had to be filed and what would be accepted in terms of funding once the Inquiry was suspended.

 

In addition, even if your applications were in time and did not, in part, cover the period that the Inquiry was suspended, you have provided insufficient evidence to allow the Panel to make a determination on what Inquiry related work you performed during the suspension period.

 

The Commission notes that other participants to the Inquiry were able to provide the Panel with sufficient evidence upon which the Panel could make a decision on the awards sought by those participants for earlier periods.

 

                                                                                                                                  Yours truly,

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                  Erica M. Hamilton

cms

Enclosures

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.