Orders

Decision Information

Decision Content

Via Email

electricity.regulatory.affairs@fortisbc.com                                          August 24, 2011

 

 

FortisBC Inc  2012-13 Revenue Requirements

and Review of ISP                                             Exhibit A-4

Mr. Dennis Swanson

Director, Regulatory Affairs

Regulatory Affairs Department

FortisBC Inc.

100-1975 Springfield Rd.

Kelowna, BC   V1Y 7V7

 

Dear Mr. Swanson:

 

Re: FortisBC Inc.

Project No. 3698620/Order G-111-11

2012-2013 Revenue Requirements and

Review of 2012 Integrated System Plan Application

 

Amendments have been made to the Initial Regulatory Timetable (Exhibit A-1) for your 2012-2013 Revenue Requirements and Review of 2012 Integrated System Plan Application submitted on June 30, 2011.  Please find a Revised Preliminary Regulatory Timetable attached as Appendix A and note the two amendments in bold.

 

                                                                                                                                Yours truly,

 

                                                                                                                                Alanna Gillis

/il

Enclosure

cc:           Registered Interveners

                (FBC-2012-13RR-RI)


 

 

An Application by FortisBC Inc.

for Approval of 2012 – 2013 Revenue Requirements and

Review of 2012 Integrated System Plan

 

 

revised preliminary regulatory timetable

 

 

 

Action

Date (2011)

Participant Assistance Budget Submission

To be Determined

FortisBC Response to Commission and Intervener IR No. 1

Friday, September 9

BCUC and Intervener IR No. 2 to FortisBC

Friday, September 30

FortisBC Response to Commission and Intervener IR No. 2

Friday, October 21

2011 Annual Review

To be Determined

Procedural Conference

To be Determined

Load Forecast Technical Committee Report filed

Friday, October 28

Procedural Order and Approval of Interim Rates Effective January 1, 2012

To be Determined

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.