Orders

Decision Information

Decision Content

IN THE MATTER OF

the Utilities Commission Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, Chapter 473

 

and

 

FortisBC Inc.

Permanent Residential Conservation Rate Exemption

for Qualified Farm Customers

Applications for Participant Assistance/Cost Award Funding

 

 

BEFORE:               C. A. Brown, Commissioner

                                H. G. Harowitz, Commissioner

                                K. A. Keilty, Commissioner

                                N. E. MacMurchy, Commissioner                              November 20, 2014

                                I. F. MacPhail, Commissioner

                                B. A. Magnan, Commissioner

                                D. M. Morton, Commissioner

                                R. D. Revel, Commissioner

                                C. van Wermeskerken, Commissioner

 

 

O  R  D  E  R

WHEREAS:

 

A.      On February 7, 2014, FortisBC Inc. (FortisBC) filed an application to make the interim residential conservation rate (RCR) exemption for qualified farm customers permanent (the Permanent Exemption Application);

 

B.      The Permanent Exemption Application originated from FortisBC’s September 27, 2012 application for an exempt residential rate that provided an interim exemption from the RCR for qualified farm customers and a permanent exemption for customers identified as participants in the RCR control group. These exemptions were approved by British Columbia Utilities Commission (Commission) Order G-167-12 on November 8, 2012, with an expiration date for the interim exemption of qualified farm customers of 15 months after the date of Order G-167-12;

 

C.      The Permanent Exemption Application was filed within the Commission ordered 15-month exemption time-frame, thus avoiding the cancellation of the interim exempt residential rate for qualified farm customers;

 

D.      The Permanent Exemption Application provided a comparison of revenues, by service point, between the flat residential rate and the RCR, and FortisBC calculated that an approximate net $99,000 loss of residential revenues would occur if qualified farm customers were on the flat residential rate instead of the RCR. FortisBC submitted that this net revenue loss represented 0.03 percent of total annual revenue requirements ($323,403,000 for fiscal 2014). In addition, as compared to the total residential class revenue requirement of $171,000,000, the revenue reduction represented only 0.06 percent of revenues and would be immaterial to any future consideration of a required rebalancing of rates between the classes;

 

E.       The Commission reviewed the Permanent Exemption Application and determined a written public review process to hear the matter was appropriate;

 

F.       Commission Order G-26-14 established a written public review process and regulatory timetable to hear the Permanent Exemption Application, and directed that the interim non-refundable Exempt Residential Rate for qualified farm customers remain in effect until the Commission made a final determination on the Permanent Exemption Application;

 

G.     British Columbia Pensioners’ and Seniors’ Organization, BC Coalition of People with Disabilities, Council of Senior Citizens’ Organizations of BC, and the Tenant Resource and Advisory Centre (BCPSO et al.), B.C. Sustainable Energy Association and the Sierra Club British Columbia (BCSEA), Regional District Central Kootenay (RDCK) and CH Four Biogas, Inc. intervened in the proceeding and made submissions;

 

H.      On April 24, 2014, the BCSEA, applied for Participant Assistance/Cost Award (PACA) funding with regard to its participation in the written proceeding leading up to the Decision;

 

I.        On May 20, 2014, the British Columbia Public Interest Advocacy Centre, on behalf of its client BCPSO et al., applied for PACA funding with regard to its participation in the written proceeding leading up to the Decision;

 

J.        On May 29, 2014, FortisBC advised the Commission it had no comments on the PACA amounts BCSEA and BCPSO et al. submitted;

 

K.      On July 21, 2014, the Commission issued Order G-96-14A and Reasons regarding the Permanent Exemption Application; and

 

L.       The Commission has reviewed the PACA applications with regard to the criteria and rates per the PACA Guidelines, and is satisfied that their approval is warranted.

 

 


NOW THEREFORE pursuant to section 118(1) of the Utilities Commission Act the British Columbia Utilities Commission orders as follows:

 

1.       The British Columbia Sustainable Energy Association and Sierra Club of BC is awarded funds in the requested amount of $1,665.30 with respect to its participation in the FortisBC Inc. Application for a Permanent Residential Conservation Rate Exemption for Qualified Farm Customers proceeding.

 

2.       The British Columba Pensioners’ and Seniors’ Organization et al. is awarded funds in the requested amount of $1,345.31 with respect to its participation in the FortisBC Inc. Application for a Permanent Residential Conservation Rate Exemption for Qualified Farm Customers proceeding.

 

3.       FortisBC Inc. must reimburse the Applicants for the amounts awarded in a timely manner.

 

 

DATED at the City of Vancouver, in the Province of British Columbia, this            21st           day of November 2014.

 

                                                                                                                                BY ORDER

 

Original Signed by:

 

                                                                                                                                D. M. Morton

                                                                                                                                Commissioner

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.