Orders

Decision Information

Decision Content

ORDER NUMBER

G-65-16

 

IN THE MATTER OF

the Utilities Commission Act, RSBC 1996, Chapter 473

 

and

 

FortisBC Energy Inc.

Proposal for Depreciation and Net Salvage Rate Changes

 

BEFORE:

D. A. Cote, Panel Chair/Commissioner

D. J. Enns, Commissioner

 

on May 11, 2016

 

ORDER

WHEREAS:

 

A.      On February 29, 2016, FortisBC Energy Inc. (FEI) filed additional information and analysis on its proposed depreciation and net salvage rate changes as directed by the British Columbia Utilities Commission (Commission) in Order G-193-15 (Application);

B.      By Order G-41-16 dated March 24, 2016, the Commission established a regulatory timetable for review of the Application, which included one round of information requests followed by submissions from FEI and registered interveners on further process;

C.      On May 9, 2016, FEI and the British Columbia Old Age Pensioners’ Organization et al. filed submissions on further process. Both parties recommended that the proceeding move to written final and reply arguments; and

D.      The Commission has reviewed the evidence and submissions and considers it appropriate to proceed directly to written final arguments.

 

NOW THEREFORE the British Columbia Utilities Commission orders that the regulatory process for the review of the FortisBC Energy Inc. Proposal for Depreciation and Net Salvage Rate Changes proceed to final arguments in accordance with the regulatory timetable set out in Appendix A to this order.

 

DATED at the City of Vancouver, in the Province of British Columbia, this             11th          day of May 2016.

 

BY ORDER

 

Original signed by:

 

D. A. Cote

Commissioner

 

Attachment

 


FortisBC Energy Inc.

Proposal for Depreciation and Net Salvage Rate Changes

 

 

REGULATORY TIMETABLE

 

 

ACTION

DATE (2016)

FEI Final Argument

Friday, May 27

Intervener Final Argument

Friday, June 10

FEI Reply Argument

Friday, June 17

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.